Resurrection Man: The BallyHolme Bandit Rides Again.

 

 

The National Union of Journalist’s Code of Conduct states in Article 2, that a journalist:

“strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair.”

It then goes on to state in Article 3, that a journalist:

“Does her/his utter most to correct harmful inaccuracies.”

These two pillars of the journalistic conduct are continually under attack, salvo after salvo coming from those who work at Ulster’s infamous ranting rag: the Sunday World. While the personal lives of most of the staff would make a sailor blush, the pathetic drivel dished out on a weekly basis would send any right think person into hiding, But not the Dreamteam.

An embarrassing array of mistakes, gaffs and downright lies, gives the Sunday World the honour of being the most sued paper in the country.  This week the Sunday World has bought up all reaming supplies of Brasso and put its Deputy Editor forward for columnist of the year, at the forthcoming IPR press awards. This, despite the continued claims by Terrie Hooley that Richard Sullivan had bullied him, stolen money and refused to repay a considerable amount to the aged rock promoter.

Just two weeks ago Sullivan was treating to take legal action against the London based Guardian over allegations of the hacking of emails between a US citizen and the American Embassy. If this is true, it is a further breech of NUJ Code of Conduct, which in article 5 states that a journalist only:

“Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means”.

In the end, Sullivan had a major testicular malfunction and had to join his close friend and colleague, Paula Mackin on the sick.  Paula whose uncle was killed in an internecine republican feud was the author of the piece that has now brought the Belfast office of the Sunday World under the scrutiny of Stephen Rea, who is mindful of the serious reverberations in the light of Leveson.  Sources in Dublin also claim that a full financial audit has been order by Neil Leslie, of the Belfast expense accounts covering a five month period. International News & Media are becoming extremely concerned about the cosy relationship that some in the Belfast office have with the PIRA’s Director of Intelligence and are contemplating action to save the company’s reputation.

On his return, Sullivan penned perhaps the most notorious of the World’s faux pas.     In one of his plague on all your houses pieces, he had Triad gangs teamed up with loyalist.  Drugs, racketeering and violence, why it was just like the Sunday World office.  He then went on to “expose” the fact that Fuzzy Cousins had been brought back to South Belfast from his hideaway in the Irish Republic. Sullivan painted a picture of how this man was going to control rackets and keep drug dealing under control. It is a wonderful piece of Sunday World journalism and should most certainly bring the Ballyholme Bandit an award of sorts.

For those who may not be aware of Fuzzy Cousins, he has been said to be guilty of many things but the ability to raise himself from the dead was not one of them.  In spite of the ever resourceful Sullivan’s bazaar ramblings we can confirm that Fuzzy Cousins is indeed dead.  On 30th May 2009, police found Fuzzy Cousins, critically injured in a London hotel room. It was believed he had fell foul of local gangsters who he had confrontations with.  He was to die of the injuries that he received after being battered with a fire extinguisher.  Two people lives would be saved with his organ donations.  So there you have it, the ability to raise the dead now seems to be in the Bandit’s repertoire.  And the weird and wonderful Sunday World journalism has descended into something like substance induced wonderland that a bad deal from the Ormeau would give.

Remember when the dickey-bow-ties are being worn and the champagne is flowing on Friday night, some of those seated at the tables and up for awards stand accused of hacking, theft, drunkenness, bulling, sexual harassment, and just barefaced lying. Richard Sullivan should get an award as the most shameless charlatan in journalism.  Spare a thought for Terrie Hooley as the Ballyholme Bandit rides again.

22 Fundamental Flaws in the Haass proposals : TUV’s analysis of the Haass’ proposals and General observations.

ass2

This is succinct analysis of why the Haass proposals are so dangerous:

22 Fundamental Flaws in the Haass proposals: TUV’s analysis of the Haass proposals and general observations:

1. Throughout the document there is not a single acknowledgement that for 30 years we faced a campaign of vicious terrorism; instead “terrorism” is sanitised down to “the conflict”, inferring the mutual responsibility of the terroriser and the terrorised. The IRA escapes even a single mention. The only time “terrorist” is mentioned is in the same breath as “freedom fighter” (p22).

2. There is no righting of the great wrong contained in the present obscene definition of “victim”, which equates the victim with the victim-maker. (Why was such essential change not made a prerequisite requirement by every unionist and victim-supportive participant? Instead concessions were made with nothing in return on this vital issue.) 3. The proposals have nothing to offer on restoring the Union flag to its rightful place on Belfast City Hall, nor is there any advance on flying the flag at Stormont.

4. The paper is premised on lauding the Belfast Agreement and its perpetual process of concessions, but without even an aspiration to bring basic democratic rights of an Opposition and the capacity to vote a party out of office. Instead, the present contrived and failing arrangements are ring fenced from even the hint of change.

5. Six new expensive quangos are proposed. The main source of appointment is OFMDFM. Given the trade off basis on which it operates, this means McGuinness will have his quota of placemen ruling the vital issues of parading and the past! Some may see this as progress, TUV certainly does not.

6. Whereas patronage is guaranteed for executive parties in the composition of the numerous anticipated quangos, there is no place for anyone outside the executive five. Ourselves Alone rules supreme.

7. Overall it is hard to see anything in the proposals for unionists. Little wonder Sinn Fein is its greatest supporter, for it represents an opportunity to pocket a bit more and move on to the next stage of the concession process.

8. Parading: Though the titles have changed the essence of the parading proposals are centred on a Parades Commission mark 2, with the addition of even more bureaucratic hurdles.

9. Every public representative of the 5 executive parties would now be committed to support every decision of the present Parades Commission, a commission which some claim they repudiate. (P4/5).

10. Instead of ECHR Art 8 rights of freedom of assembly being paramount, under the agreement they would be tempered by deference to other claimed rights eg rights pertaining to commerce and what are called “societal interests” (things not expressly recognised in ECHR and thus of lesser status). (P4/5).

11. The stringent obligations on parade organisers include taking vicarious responsibility for full compliance by all participants, including bands, with imposed conditions and the ‘code of conduct’, which, it would, appear could give rise to both criminal and civil liability. (P7/8).

12. Anyone from anywhere can lodge an objection to any parade anywhere and in consequence the parade organisers must engage with them in “sustained and meaningful dialogue” (P9). Failure to agree will result in referral to the Adjudicating Authority. Also, failure to dialogue will be a criterion informing adjudication (P12). By making objection so easy and non specific, the situation is ripe for malevolent and organised objection to every parade anywhere. Given Sinn Fein’s past orchestration of objection, it now has a charter for unfettered objection as a vehicle to blight the entire parading tradition and force every parade into the protracted and convoluted dialogue and adjudication process.

13. Traditional routes and the use of arterial routes does not raise any presumption in adjudication, but, rather, rank no greater than interests such as potential disruption to community life or commerce (P12).

14. It is hard to escape the conclusion that a prime motivation in encasing parading in such a straight jacket of oppressive regulation is to encourage a diminution in the practice. Putting organisers through such needless hoops is an effort to discourage them from even bothering.

15. Flags and emblems: The proposals talk of “a special and protected place” for Irishness (P16). Relying on the parity afforded by the perverse Belfast Agreement to Britishness and Irishness in this part of the UK, Haass (P15) proposed a role “for the sovereign flag of Ireland in conjunction with the Union Flag in this jurisdiction”. Such is the outworking of the pernicious Belfast Agreement, designed, of course, to ultimately make the Tricolour the flag of all Ireland. Just how much the Belfast Agreement is a process, not a settlement, is very evident from the opening paragraphs of the Haass proposals.

16. The proposal (P17) for a Commission to address not just flags, but cultural emblems, the Irish language and identity, is but another means to condition the public for meeting the republican agenda for change on all these issues and deliver another result when the concession meter next needs fed. Even public holidays are to be reviewed; stand by for a campaign to obliterate 12th July as a public holiday. And, of course, the cleansing of our councils of British symbols is in there too. (p17).

17. The Past: Even the law abiding majority are slighted by Haass with this slur and terror-excusing comment: “The vast majority assiduously eschewed violence, yet some may have contributed to the environment within which it flourished.” (P23).

18. Then, the criminal justice system, which saw several judges and hundreds of RUC officers murdered by the IRA, is slurred by Haass when he refers (p23) to convictions “by justice mechanisms which did not elicit full faith from all of society” ( ie the terrorists and their acolytes who made the justice system a particular target for vilification).

19. Through the Historical Investigative Unit (HIU) a parallel police force is to be created, with equal investigative powers as the PSNI. Thus, arrests, searches, forensics etc will all be within their powers. How and when such will be recruited is scarcely covered, except it seems ex police officers will be barred. There appears to be little regard to the duplicate costs, but, clearly, money presently available for hospitals, schools etc will be diverted. Actions by “state actors”, such as the RUC and UDR, will be more readily investigated than the criminality of the terrorists. State files and records will be available and compellable; terrorist secrets will remain hidden. So, the prospect is of the RUC and UDR being hung out to dry while the IRA continues to escape.

20. The alternative Independent Commission for Information Retrieval (ICIR) is a pitiful substitute for the justice that innocent victims crave. Untested, even anonymous, self-serving terrorist versions of the “truth” provide more opportunity for Provo rewrite of history than satisfaction for innocent victims. Smithwick is a recent reminder that even what the Provos tell can’t be believed. And, then, as a bonus the terrorist gets immunity, both criminal and civil, on the information provided and can preserve his anonymity (p34)! Little wonder, again, Sinn Fein are so keen!

21. The proposal that ICIR will also investigate “themes” is key to the republican agenda to rewrite history. Already we’ve had a diet of “collusion” allegations for years, now, as a theme it will be elevated and given credence by ICIR pursuit of it. (P33) Again, state records will be interrogated, but if border genocide was investigated as a theme there will be no Provo archives opened up. A wholly lopsided approach and outcome will result.

22. Haass provides nothing for post April 1998 victims, like Omagh victims or the families of IRA victims Robert McCartney and Paul Quinn. It wouldn’t do to remind anyone that the IRA went on killing! Lopsided – full rigour of law to require state forces to tell all, while terrorists can and will opt for their self-serving version of the truth. Betrayal of rule of law by substituting mere truth recovering for justice.

Jim Allister

Formal Complaint About The RUC Investigation Into Claudy And The Role Of Sate Agents.

DSCF8401

Statement made after a delegation made a formal complaint, to the PSNI, about  the failure of both the RUC and PSNI  to properly investigate the facts surrounding the Claudy Bombings.  They also called for the investigation into the use of state agents connected with it and other terrorist incidents.

“We are here today to demand that the Police Service of Northern Ireland properly investigate the the Claudy Bombings and those involved. The previous investigations, have been mere cover ups of the true facts surrounding the murders on that day, and the failure of the police to act against hose responsible led to the murder of a large number of other innocent victims in North Antrim and County Londonderry. These include the murder of policemen, UDR members and civilians at the hands of those responsible for Claudy. Those responsible include a number of state agents who were allowed to carry on with their terror campaign while having confessed to murder. They would less than a year later bomb Coleraine, this is why we have come here to make an official complaint.”

Concillor William Blair, David Nicholl – Ulster News – and Adrian Eakin stated that nothing short of the establishment of an independent inquiry, could help establish the truth about what happened that day – 31st July 1972 and the subsequent cover-ups.

Adrian Eakin ended by stating:

 “We want a public inquiry the same as the Bloody Sunday people got. At the end of the day, they lost relatives. They’ve got most of the answers.”

New Demands For Claudy Cover-up To Be Investigated

This is a statement that has bee released by a Ballymoney TUV councillor, William Blair, calling for a public inquiry.  We hope this is the first of many and that all politicians will join the fight for justice for the victims.

We in the Ulster News, welcome the statement from William Blair TUV in relation to the demand for a full independent inquiry into the Claudy Bombing, in conjunction with the many statements made by relatives and other political parties over many years, the latest admission made by Ivan Cooper discloses sufficient new evidence on its own to merit a reinvestigation of the facts by the PSNI and The HET.

It is a disgrace that HMG continues to block with others in authority these demands for a full independent investigation into this atrocity. We demand in the interests of fairness and natural justice that those who so long have covered up these events will now rethink their positions on the matter and now grant a rigorous and full investigation into these events whilst the perpetrators are themselves still available to be questioned and prosecuted. David Nicholl

William Blair

               William Blair

Press Release on Claudy Revelations

 

Forty one years ago, republican terrorists planted three bombs in the village of Claudy.  Nine people would be murdered with those devices, including women and children from all sections of the community. No one ever admitted this terrible atrocity which has left scars and hurt, that have transcended generations.  The failure of the Police to properly investigate these murders has brought about a generational victimhood in some families who have been unable to find closure.

 

There have been a number of investigations into what happened at Claudy and subsequent events surrounding it, most notably the most recent of these have uncovered that elements in the Roman Catholic Church, the RUC and the Northern Ireland Office conspired and colluded in the cover up of the involvement of a priest in these murders. The active role played by these powerful bodies in scuttling an investigation still has not been fully scrutinised. This coupled by the PSNI’s refusal to fully investigate the crimes carried out and the collusion that followed has left serious questions unanswered – this taints any localised investigation. 

 

In the aftermath of the Claudy massacre, Ivan Cooper, who was the local MP at the time, stated that:

 

This incident can only be equated with what happened on Bloody Sunday.  I cannot express words strong enough to condemn the people responsible for this terrible outrage. 

 

Those words now ring with shame, after Mr Cooper’s own revelations that a short time after the bombings, one of the perpetrators confessed to him.  In 2002, Mr Cooper stated that a mysterious figure had appeared outside his office and told him that a priest had been involved.  This was a fictitious account and, in fact, one of the bombers, who he states was a school teacher, gave him a full confession of his actions.  Mr Cooper then states that he took the murderer to meet with a senior police officer.  No charges were ever brought against this man; he was free to continue his life of terrorism.  Mr Cooper and Frank Lagan both committed and an awful act against the victims by being part of a cover-up.  I believe this was a criminal conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and that is why I will be making a formal complaint on the matter to the Police Service of Northern Ireland.  

 

Unlike Ivan Cooper, I believe his words of August 1972, Claudy should be paralleled alongside Bloody Sunday and demand that it should be investigated in the same rigorous and exhaustive manner   That is why I and some of those affected by the disgraceful actions demand that  a full and independent public inquiry into the cover-up that surrounds Claudy and those who perpetrated it. takes place.   Only then, free from interference of those who are hiding the truth can the victims find closure.

 

Councillor William Blair. 

“Victims? Don’t be melodramatic.” Claudy Cover-up Unravelling

The Cooper Confession

          The Cooper Confession

“Victims? Don’t be melodramatic.”

“Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever? If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, Old Man, tell me to keep my money, or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, Old Man. Free of income tax – the only way you can save money nowadays.” 

Harry Lime, The Third Man

My first recollection of the Claudy Bombings was as a young boy looking at hunting scenes in a book.  Black and white photographs of a village decimated by bombs.  It was one of those times in life when you know something has changed you but you are not quite sure what.  I never knew that I would write about or meet some of those whose lives were as decimated as Claudy by the bombs that day.  It has been a life changing experience for me.

claudy-priest-bomb

I have heard of grief and suffering that cannot be put into words, yet somehow the story has to be told.  It is not a story with any redeeming factors, there are no heroes that come to the rescue, there is no silver lining to Claudy’s cloud , there is no happy ever after, there is no waking form the nightmare of the Claudy story.  In fact, the more you dig, the more corruption and hatred spills out before you.  The story of Claudy is not a simple one, it is and intricate web that leads to the highest political offices in Stormont and Westminster.   It is one that shows that the police were willing to allow the bombers to go free for their own ends and that politicians and church leaders were willing to cover up the murder of children.  The most disturbing thing is that those behind Claudy were free to kill again and again.

The story of Claudy does not begin there and it does not end there.  It does not involve just one priest; it does not involve one village; it involves the systematic cover-up of a large number of murders which could have been prevented.  There have now been at least four investigations into Claudy, not one of them yielding any truth on the matter, yet every detail of what happened that day is known.

For just four months, Ulster News has been investigating the truth behind what happened on the 31st July 1972, we have meet with relatives, locals, former security force members, ex republicans and investigators. What has been uncovered is earth shattering and exposes the cover-up and collusion on a vast scale.

During one of our meeting with former Claudy residents Ulster News brought a dossier on the facts about the bombing and those involved.  The document lists the involvement of around fifteen people: the drivers, the bomb makers and those who offered logistical support. These include both men and women.  It is interesting reading. With the dossier and the knowledge of the locals, as well as the relatives, a detailed picture of all that took place is being constructed for the first time.   Five or six of the number have stood in elections for Sinn Fein and at least five have served life sentences for other murders, one nicknamed “nail bomb” has become one of the wealthiest men in Ireland – every detail of those responsible is known, yet no convictions.  It is also known that one of the drivers started to work for RUC Special Branch just after Claudy and would one day lead the PIRA in South Derry.

The most perturbing aspect of the investigation was uncovering that the Chesney gang  was under constant security force surveillance for at least a seven month period prior to the attacks.  In December 1971, Chesney had ordered a bombing in Magherafelt, three young men would die as they tried to deliver the bomb.  The priest and his parochial house were put under watch.  Despite that, he and his murderous missions continued.  The house had become an arms dump, come headquarters but no action was forthcoming.   On five occasions, permission was sought to raid the house and arrest the occupants, each time this was refused. This has led to speculation that the priest was working for some intelligence agency. Ulster News has not come across any evidence of this.  But the uses of an SB block on the house suggests that something was going on that warranted their protection.

The area from where the three young men who died in the 1971 blast came from is important, the cars used to bomb Claudy were taken there.  More importantly, the cars used in the priest’s response to his move over the border, the copycat of Claudy, one year later, Coleraine, were taken in the area too.  Coleraine was chosen because there were those there who did not want Claudy to die. This was the priest’s warning.  Chesney despite his move continued to have an active role in murder as did the other Claudy killers, some helping to form the INLA.

During one discussion about the disappearance of the files into Claudy, one individual with an insight to such matters, who was not at the meeting and was, speaking off the record, said:

“the original file is well gone, a digitised copy will exist somewhere safe in North Down, but no one will ever see it.”

These were the issues that were discussed in the presents of a community worker and a unionist politician. Coming to the close of the meeting I asked had they ever contacted Ivan Cooper.  What was said was not complimentary.  Those present told us that Cooper knew exactly who was involved in the bombing and every detail of what they had did,  they went on to say that Cooper had evidence that could convicted those guilty of mass murder.  I left perplex, if that was the case, why had he not made a public statement or personally went to the police ombudsman?

claudy (3)

I have learned never to assume anything in the search for the truth.  I have also learnt that for some reason Claudy frightens people, they don’t want to talk about the events of that Monday morning forty one years ago.  Most have the opinion that sleeping dogs should be left to their slumber but for some of those who have suffered because of it, this simply is not an option.  Two weeks ago the former PIRA publicity spokesman confirmed that they carried out the attack.  On Sunday Ivan Cooper, after forty years of silence, admitted one of the bombers, a former school teacher, confessed to him and that he took him to meet a senior RUC officer.  In the coming weeks we will continue to look at those who had license to kill in Claudy.  Grouse beating season has  begun.

IRA Admit Bombing After Forty Years

claudy (3)                                                    Victory for Ulster News

Danny Morrison, the architect of the “Ballot Box and Armalite”,  has admitted that the PIRA carried out the Massacre of Claudy.  After forty years of lies and deceit, the republican movement has now come clean.  The revelation coincides with Ulster News’ ongoing series which investigates the Claudy bombings.  In our next  article, we will look at those who carried it out; how it could have been stopped and how two of those who were involved in the massacre, both senior figures in the republican movement, escaped prosecution because of their connections to the intel services.

DSCF8116

Operation Malison: Part Two, The Carnage.

Claudy Bomb

Claudy Bombing

” An explosion too loud for your eardrums to bear

Young children squealing like pigs in the square

All faces chalk-white or streaked with bright red

And the glass, and the dust, and the terrible dead”

“For an old lady’s legs are blown off, and the head

Of a man’s hanging open, and still he’s not dead

He is shrieking for mercy while his son stands and stares

And stares, and then suddenly – quick – disappears”

“And Christ, little Katherine Eakin is dead

Mrs. McLaughlin is pierced through the head

Meanwhile to Dungiven the killers have gone”

At around 10.15  am,   the explosive filled car planted by the priest  Chesney detonated in front of McElhinney’s Bar and grocer’s, where Elizabeth (Tracy) McElhinney was at the petrol pumps, on the village Main Street.  This popular woman received the full force of the blast, as she was just two meters from the car bomb.  She had worked as the local village nurse and is said to have been at every birth and death in the previous decades.  She had loved life and to help others,  now she was dead.

DSCF8116

One local old age pensioner sobbed as he recalled her and the goodness she showed to others:

“She was the nicest women on God’s earth and it didn’t matter who you were, she couldn’t do enough to help you. She didn’t deserve the like of that.  Ah Jesus, but it was a dirty thing they did this morning.”

Another would recall how she had cared for him after a car crash, “I had a car accident and it was Tracy McElhinney who nursed me back to life. I’ll never forget her for that.”

Across the street, a vibrant and beautiful nine year old girl was busy helping with chores at the family shop. Those with her, lives would soon change for ever; the pain unleashed that Monday morning would still be as fresh forty years on. Katherine Ekin was cleaning the windows of the shop when the bomb exploded. Her brother, Mark, who was playing on the bonnet of one of the car bombs just before it detonated, would state:

“There was an almighty bang and the next thing I knew was I was out on the street and when I turn round Katharine was lying on the foot path. She wasn’t moving at all”.

He would then state “everything that I knew of Claudy was gone.”

His mother would say later that she heard the bang and in the shock and confusion was screaming, she then said, “Then her grandfather came over and said ‘I was with her at the end’ I didn’t understand, the end of what?”. Merle Eakin would talk of never seeing her daughter married or grandchildren. Mark would say after her death that “she missed out on the life of her daughter.”

DSCF8125
Pearl Donley related that all was normal, then, the carnage ripped through the village without warning. She was seated beside her husband in the front of their car, parked on Main Street, when a relative spotted them, Joseph McCloskey, and walked across the road to talk to them as his child was in the car with them. She tells of the monstrous wickedness as it unfolded:

“He was our brother-in-law and we had his little boy Emmett, who is only four, with us in the car.  Joe was standing at the car window chatting when there was a terrible bang.  He just disappeared.”

The husband of Pearl, Patrick, told of what happened to Joseph McCoskey, “He was blown across the street” and would go on to state “The blast catapulted me from the car but Pearl and I were lucky to escape with only cuts and bruises.”

claudy 22

The toddler Emmett escaped injury but the witnessing of his father’s horrific murder at such an early age most have been traumatic beyond comparison.

A local grocer, Terence Peoples, ran to the seat of the blast at McElhinney’s Bar, he recalled:

“People were squealing in terror.  A woman was in the street ablaze. It was terrible. I was afraid for the safety of my three children and ran home to get them clear before any more bombs went off.”

A Belfast police sergeant, who was on holiday in the village, Des Jones, watched as the mayhem was unleashed.  He told of how “There was panic and confusion everywhere” and would say “I could see people dead and mutilated”.

At the first bomb, three had been murdered; nine year old Kathryn Eakin, fifty nine year old Elizabeth McElhinney and Joseph McCloskey. Scores lay wounded and three more would die of critical injuries sustained in the first blast in the coming days. They were Rose McLaughlin, whose murder orphaned eight children, Patrick Connolly and Arthur Hone.

clady 11

Des Jones

After the initial explosion, Des Jones’ experience on the streets of Belfast kicked in.  He started to move the people away from the blast area, while doing this he looked for vehicles that might contain further devices.  He would later say:

 “After the first explosion I searched the street in case more bombs were concealed in other cars.  I saw one car with a ten gallon milk churn inside. There were two wires leading an alarm clock and covered by a black coat. I tried to lift the bomb from the car but it was too heavy and I decided to leave it.  I then warned the people to get away from the spot.  Moments later the bomb went off.”

One local recounts that as he was about to enter the Post Office to collect  his pension when he heard the first bomb go off. He then told of how he was next to the premises when he heard: Get t’ll hell out of it. There’s another bomb.”  He said he then “ran as fast as he could”.  Only for Jones warning he would have, no doubt, be blown to bits.  Others were not as lucky.

Noel McFeily, a local said that:

“After the first explosion everyone rushed down the street towards the second car bomb. But Sergeant Jones shepherded them back and must have saved many lives by his action.”

As the warning was being shouted by Des Jones, a bomb detonated at the front of the Beaufort Hotel, those who had sought safety from the first bomb and the discovery of the device at the Post Office were caught in the 250 pound blast.  Three would die. One, William Temple, a sixteen year old from a neighbouring village, had been injured in the first blast but continued to work on as milkman’s helper.  He had just left the Beaufort Hotel, after leaving a milk order, where he had told its owner, Mrs Hamilton, of his lucky escape minutes before.  It was his first day of his first job.  He was blown to bits just outside as he still tried to deliver milk.

claudy 333

Two men who were sweeping the street but had stopped to help the injured died in the blast too: David Miller and James McClellend.  David Miller’s wife was having tea in the Beaufort with Mrs Hamilton when the explosion accrued.  Annie Miller had just sat down with her  friend, when the second blast devastated the street outside.  Both ran into the street  where carnage displayed its full horror.   The Claudy hotelier would later relate what awaited them on street. It is harrowing.  Annie Miller’s husband’s mangled and mutilated body lay on the road. “The only way Mrs Miller could identity him was by the buttons she had sewn on his coat that morning.” she would say. David Miller’s brother Gordon would say “we saw things that no one should ever have to see.”

Within seconds of the second deadly blast at the Beaufort, the third and final of the day went off at the front of the Post Office.  Due to the area being cleared no one died as a result.

DSCF8121

A Fire brigade spokesman would say that the scene was one of absolute carnage:

“Bodies were badly mutilated and doctors and nurses and people were running with bandages from the chemist shop trying to attend the injured.  People were literally blown to bits.”

One villager would had fought in both World Wars, earning seven camping medals, related that the worst suffering he had ever saw was at Gallipoli.  He would say: “but you knew who your enemies were” he would go on and say “This is worse. I’ve seen nothing as cruel.

As those in Claudy cried and contemplated the day of horrific suffering that had visited their now broken community. Wicked men celebrated, happy in the death they had unleashed on an unsuspecting village.  The first warning was received after the first bomb went off.

images (1)That night Operation Motorman was a success.  McGuinness sent out orders that the youth of republican areas should continue to attack the army as they cleared the “No-go” areas.  McGuinness dress as a woman fled across the border while others fought his battles.  His poor showing in the defence of the “No-go” areas caused other provos to christen him the “actor”.  He meet with his close friend who had returned from bombing Claudy, the two travelled to McGuinness’ grandmother’s farm, in Illies region of Donegal, where they hid out together and celebrated the day’s success.

No one ever admitted to the terrible atrocity that took place in the sleepy village of Claudy, on the 31st July 1972.  Some senior members of the PIRA initially believed it was an attack carried out by a secret unit of the army to blacken republicans.  Why would anyone put three no warning car bombs in the Main Street of a mixed village, with no military?   This overshadowed the propaganda coup of the decade for them: large numbers of British troops invading republican areas.  Some asked questions, why did Derry not make a stand? Why had the PIRA commander fled leaving children to fight? But most importantly, why had he sent three large no-warning bombs to attack civilians – many Roman Catholic?  Many left the PIRA with these questions unanswered.

Within days of the triple bomb attack, the police were aware of the identities of those who had taken part and organised the massacre.  What would take place over the next six months would bring shame to the RUC, the Roman Catholic Church and the British Government, particularly the Conservative Party.  While those who murdered men, women and children continued unabated.  The Triple Cross of Ulster’s citizens took place in an interwoven web of dark intrigue, which would see those guilty of mass murder able to remain free, protected by church and state; some of those would reach the highest pinnacle of political life, while under that protection.  The True extent of the cover-up and collision by members of the British Conservative Party, the Roman Catholic Church and the RUC, in protecting PIRA murders, would only be released when those responsible could not face justice.

Next: the reaction and the collusion

Additional reporting by David Nicholl.

Operation Malison: The Priest, The Provie And The Politician.

Claudy Bomb

Claudy Massacre

Due to the length of our report into the Claudy Collusion, we have had to split it into a number of articles. The next article will deal with the casualties and the cover-up, that would involve the police, the Roman Catholic Church, a unionist politician and one of the most senior figures in Margaret Thatcher’s Government. 

DSCF8115

It was a beautiful summer’s day in July 1972, the sun was glorious, its shimmers hit the car like golden coins being thrown in a pound, as it made its way along the hawthorn hedgerows.  There were only two men in the car as it criss-crossed the roads in order to evade army checkpoints.  It had made its way out of Londonderry and was heading along the Rockhead Road.  It carried the occupants the eight miles or so into the Irish Republic until it reached its destination – Fahan – a beautiful hamlet overlooking Lough Swilly.  It was a million miles away from the bombed out shell of a city from which they had come.

The car pulled up to a house and the passenger left the driver.  As he approached the door, a nun opened it and declared, “The Father is waiting in the front room.”  The man entered and the priest rose to greet him another sister arriving with tea.

Once alone, the two men set about their business.  It was not a pre-matrimonial interview or a special confession, nor was it a an interview to assess the suitability to take orders.  No this had a more sinister objective.  In a room, whose walls would normally hear prayers or worlds from the Missal, something else would take place.  These men would not talk of the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ; today their subject would be death and destruction on a mass scale.  This was no ordinary priest and no ordinary twenty two year old.  Both were respective members of the PIRA, holding equal positions in it, in neighbouring areas.

1972__Martin-McGui_2260242k

The young man had literally obliterated his own city centre, destroying one hundred and thirty out of the one hundred and fifty commercial premises at its heart.  This would only stop once his friends had bought up the barren land, and then his bombing campaign would stop just as swiftly and resoundingly as it had begun. But not now, murder and mayhem were still his objectives.  He was viewed as that important,  that earlier in the month, the British Prime Minister had sent an army helicopter to the verge of the republican Bogside, to take him for talks. This took place while he was supposedly on the run and wanted by the same army.

The IRA had been warned by an RUC Chief Superintendent, Frank Lagan, that the military had plans to move into the “no-go” areas that littered working class suburbs of Northern Ireland. He had sent this information to Martin McGuiness, who was now making plans to remove all ordinances from his command area.  He was approached by a MI6 asset who gave assurances that this could be taken care of it.  The asset then under MI6 protection removed a vast amount of guns and explosives to Donegal in the Irish Republic, where it was split up and place in hides.

Both men at the meeting made arrangements and chose a target for their attack.  It was to take place on the 31st July 1972,  just when the British operation was being mounted.  The target was a choice that still baffles people today: Claudy.   Of all the military and commercial targets available to the murdering conglomerate, they chose one that had no value in those terms at all.

claudy-priest-bomb

The priest, the OC and Director of Operation for the South Derry IRA, made arrangements to have some commercial explosives and detonators moved to a hideout in Craigavale, just outside Swatragh.  It was a place that they had used on numerous occasions, over the last year or so.  The land was close to the residents’ a number of the priest’s men and could be easily watched.

It is believed up to ten men worked for almost a week to prepare for the attack on Claudy.  Cars were stolen in the Loop an area of Magherafelt and other surrounding towns.  In all, five car bombs were constructed at the farm.

The bomb mix was made up and placed in milk churns with shrapnel, these were then placed in each of the vehicles and timer power units attached.  A bulb was connected to the circuit so if there was a fault the bombers would see the lighted bulb and abandon the device.  The five bomb laden vehicle stayed at the hideout for a number of days, watched over by a friend of the priest who lived close by.

DSCF8116

On the morning of the 31st July, 1972, Father Chesney met with six other men.  They would be the unit that would drive the car bombs to the subdued village. The priest told those there that he would be leading the bombing mission, he chose the yellow Ford Cortina. Chesney had a liking of cars.  The others were a green Morris Minivan and a Mini Traveller.

The timers were set but not connected to the detonators.  They were timed to explode fifteen minutes apart, a tactic later adopted by Islamic terrorists. Multiple and staggered detonations; a system of bombing that ensure a maximum casualty rate.

A four car convoy then began the twenty mile trip to Claudy.  The armed Chesney leading and close friend, who was said to be his second in command at the time, followed in an orange Volkswagen, which would be used as the main getaway car. As they approached Claudy the bombers connected the two wires to the detonators. The bombs were now fully armed.

Although it was a Monday, the school holidays were in fully swing, so children were openly playing on the streets and busy with chores. The village was busy with shoppers and a number of visitors had arrived in the normally sleepy hamlet.

DSCF8120No one took notice as murderous payloads were parked. Chesney pulled up at  McElhinney’s bar on the Main street.  The Mini Traveller was parked in front of the Post Office, a place that would be extremely busy on any Monday morning. The last bomb, in the green, Morris Minivan, was left at the Beaufort Hotel.

As Chesney left the vehicle, children played round the car which contained the ticking bomb. That day would see the ghastly murder of some and those who survived would relive the terror the rest of their lives.

DSCF8119

Due to the length of our report into the Claudy Collusion, we have had to split it into a number of articles. The next article will deal with the casualties and the cover-up, that would involve the police, the Roman Catholic Church, a unionist politician and one of the most senior figures in Margaret Thatcher’s Government. 

Additional reporting by David Nicholl.

The Good Friday Agreement: Where are we now? Part Two

ira4

Ulster News’ North Ulster Editor and political analyst, David Nicholl, looks at the failings and corruption of the Northern Ireland Peace Process in a two part series. He concludes that the current political spectrum is one based on greed and sectarianism, that benefits the political and business elite, at the expense of the working class. Far from making Northern Ireland a fair society, the Good Friday Agreement made it a parody of nepotism and corruption. 

Who are the ‘dissidents’?

In this false environment, many recognised the flaws, and chose instead to hold on to true unionist ideologies; the ways of Carson, Craig and Molyneux.  Contrary to Government and constitutional nationalist propaganda, most of those who dissented from the GFA were not principled Republicans and socialists. They were in fact Principled Unionists, and Loyalists. Yet they were relegated to the position of the lunatic or begrudgers, as the lifestyles of one time “NO” figures were changed beyond recognition. Recently we have been described in Stormont as Jeremiahs by the First Minister himself.

Now constitutional Republicans have become landlords, speculators and property developers, and in turn are, lauded by the press and newspapers at business award dinners, all attended by PSNI Chief Constables and DUP and SF/IRA stalwarts.

Together and with the backing of the international business elite, these elements tried and almost succeeded in creating a new universal ethic here.

In republican and in Unionist districts a conservative world- view was promoted by politicians across the spectrum, as well as by non-elected community leaders and partisan journalists, themselves with a stake in the new economy and who were bound by the demands of Republican pre-conditions and vetoes.. 50/50 recruitment in policing, the McBride Principles in Employment ect.

Community solidarity, of the type which had seen working class districts stand by each other in the face of cutbacks, poverty, anti-social behaviour and state aggression was discredited by party workers and community leaders who floated initiatives such as business centred health care, a gradual move towards the acceptance of water charges and reliance on the PSNI. Community cohesion was further corroded by an encouraged culture of ‘home ownership’ a condition which by accident or design has tamed once radical communities, tying many key individuals to a slavish combination of low wages and ever demanding high mortgages.

This social taming measure had been a central plank of Margaret Thatcher’s socio-economic vision for Britain during her time in government and explained the mass selloff of council housing during her time. The subsequent turnaround brought on by the banking crisis is that many have had homes repossessed, lost their jobs and are in negative equity. They also now face cuts to the welfare programs that once supported them through unemployment, and are witness to a government imposed Bedroom Tax or reduction in rates which forces them out of their family homes.

Even at an early stage, some journalists with conviction and sensing that the economic ‘boom’ here was not altogether natural and spontaneous, rightly dubbed what was happening as ‘the feel good factor’, an essential and designed element in the process of securing the ‘peace process’.

Nationalisms’ reward came in the form of incentives to investment along with the strategic funding of an array of paid community posts pre-allocated to local republicans of influence, tying them into the taming and controlling influence of the mortgage culture, a culture which it was now in their personal interests to maintain. Many republicans took to this culture like ducks to water and are now wealthy beyond avarice in some cases. Millionaire Lifestyles are not unusual in the new republican political class, many of them becoming private landlords and owning multiple homes a Following the Signing of the GFA financial incentive programmes went into hyper mode, inviting a scramble by international business’ to get here and avail of now famous tax relief packages, grants and subsidies, and buoyed by promises of the type made quite recently by Deputy Minister Martin McGuinness on US business trips, ie: ‘the north is open for business’, code for we can offer the lowest paid work force in the “United Kingdom”.

Few would have criticised the working class for embracing the sparse benefits of this new system, for many young families it provided (albeit for a short period) the impression that they could prosper and be rewarded for their efforts, in a secure job and a peaceful environment.

Indeed it was difficult to even question the apparent economic successes here without sounding like a ‘mad rebel clutching at straws’ that was at least until recent times, when it seems that the artificial ‘feel good factor’ has passed its sell by date.

It is beyond doubt, that those who refused to concede or conform to the GFA (referred to as ‘dissidents or jeremiahs) are being isolated from society, to the point in which they became politically powerless – and some – politically inactive.

However it is understandable that with the pressure of world opinion, finance and power bearing down on us, dissenting voices effectively retreated into the political wilderness. This was not the first time in recent history that Loyalism was pushed to the margins of society, and in such a fashion. The Ulster Workers Strike and in the aftermath of the Ango/Irish protests also spring to mind,  when loyalism was put back in its box while the politicians went back to their paid jobs and private investment portfolios.

This state of cold storage however is thankfully coming to an end, as the contradictions within the GFA become more glaring day by day and Loyalism grows in confidence, learning more about these contradictions and exercising their ability to articulate criticism, as well as organise alternatives.

 

ahn 99

Smoke and Mirrors “Illusion” of well being.

Almost simultaneously to the announcement of PIRA decommissioning, came news of the Stormont assembly’s intention to introduce water charges to the public. They said it was an economic necessity coming just as Gerry Adams’ criticised Westminster’s failure to make available a ‘peace deficit’ here.

Lobbying for a ‘peace deficit’ effectively asked that Britain’s former security budget for the north to be ploughed instead into Stormont’s budget, it didn’t happen.

Days later arrived a shocking news story of mass job losses at the Seagate factory in County Londonderry, breaking symptoms of what was soon to be rolled out as the now infamous ‘credit crunch’ or economic global downturn.

As more and more job losses were inflicted upon the workforces it became evident to critics of Good Friday that the mass subsidies, incentives and rescue packages (characteristic of pre – 2005 British economic policy) would no longer be forthcoming.  It appeared that Britain having secured alleged PIRA decommissioning saw how the potential threat posed by mass disaffection here was nullified. There was no further need to tame the working class, it was safe to withdraw subsidies and ‘let whatever happens happen’, and so they did, it is that simple.  The only significant British government investment here since has come in the form of MOD contracts to Thales Air Defence.

As a result,  today, whole districts in the Northern Ireland, Protestant and Catholic alike are blighted by serious social problems, problems indirectly related to the conflict here and made worse by both the recent false economy and its resulting anti-social ethic. There exists now, chronic levels of negative equity; heart-breaking cases of working families who had placed their faith in a false economy and had signed up to mortgages which could not be backed up by their employers in the long term.

Thousands now face the real threat of losing their homes as firms are either driven out by the global downturn or (as in the case of Visteon/Ford) simply decide to move onto to a cheaper workforce in the sudden absence of British subsidies, using the recession as a smokescreen.

Meanwhile the social fabric of once solid working class loyalist areas has been severely compromised by individualism; a form of thinking largely brought around by the ‘own your own home’ culture, a culture which not only questions the universal right of every family to own a home unconditionally but arguably contributes to anti-community behaviour, as the ‘look after your own patch’ mind-set takes over what had been a ‘look out for your neighbour’ mind-set in the past.

The complete futility of modern Unionism’ has become and embarrassment. ‘Northern Ireland’ and its economy can be seen in the Democratic Unionist and Sinn Fein’s inability to protect the recently unemployed in even the sparsest form.

The lobbying for decent redundancy packages on behalf of the Visteon/Ford workers can hardly be seen as victory for the workers, it was no more than a Band-Aid over shrapnel wound, and with each day comes more news of impending job losses.

 

Attacks on the Benefit System

And as for the growing dole queues! DHSS Staff cannot keep up with the influx of claimants. Amazingly, following the St. Andrews agreement, politicians here were offered the opportunity to devolve social welfare powers, but they declined.

Had they devolved, they would have been able to offset the effect of Westminster’s recent anti-working class welfare measures, such as the welfare reform bill and the lowering of the age of a child at which point a single mother must return to work, or the replacement of incapacity benefit with the American style ESA system.

As it stands the recently unemployed will at the point of claiming benefits take on the role of the ‘undeserving poor’, scrutinised by a department who will hold them responsible for their situation.

As always, the opportunists, the army, Navy and Air force are all making the best of people’s desperation with an all-out recruitment drive taking place across the board in the job markets as even a brief visit will demonstrate. Just where the vision of Carson and Craig, fits into this scenario is a question which DUP supporters can now only counter by screaming accusations of criminality at the Loyalist community.

 


aaaakkkuuuddd

Why Stand Outside the ‘Peace Process’?

We should all at this point ask ourselves the serious question, are we really committed to following this path to peace?

Although they are well meaning, some principled Unionists and Loyalists still campaign solely on the issue of ‘the border” while being neutral on the economic question; others are unashamed advocates of Capitalism. This position is a non-starter as it is at best doomed to perpetuate failures of the past and at worst, take us to oblivion.

If some are not committed to finding a new path – and merely wish to return (solely) to the war politics of the past – then there is no reason to expect that the lure of the economic incentives mentioned above (which did compromise our political leaderships) could not take their toll on them too in future decades.

 

If that was to be the case, then they would be as well backing the Sinn Fein electoral strategy now instead of later, indeed that is point Sinn Fein spokes-people are making, when they mislead the public by asking unionism to ‘debate’ with them.

Those of us who do stand ‘Outside the Peace Process’ do so with good reason, yet we should be aware of those reasons, so as not be lured into similar processes in the future.

images (52)

The Alternative?

Loyalists stand by the belief that the struggle for Ulster should be practiced hand in hand, that the liberators of Northern Ireland will be working class and that it will be within a duel struggle for control of the ‘ territory’ and the ‘Means of production’ that a worthy freedom will eventually be achieved.

Such a process would take place on our terms (not Britain’s or the Republics) but would require the challenging of both communal sectarian identities (green and orange) as well as of capitalist economic priorities in Northern Ireland, cross border though they may be.

In conclusion therefore; Loyalists view the so called ‘Peace Process’ as in fact inherently sectarian, inherently divisive and inherently capitalist, promoting ultimately communal division, and the dominance of a greedy political class who care little for the economic well-being or welfare of the people north or south.

We on the other hand, intend to propose a programme of Revolutionary Unionism, the encouragement of the working class to peruse a Free Democratic Government and not for nationalistic or emotional reasons, but for practical and humane reasons and as part of the progressive struggle for control of our own resources, to be worked for the welfare and future integrity of all our people.

We believe such a path to be the true Unionist & non-sectarian path, the route towards healing our Nation and people, and freeing it from sectarian and nationalist evils; from corruption, poverty and privilege, instead taking us towards true Ulster freedom.

 

The Good Friday Agreement: Where are we now?

Good Friday Agreement

Ulster News’ North Ulster Editor and political analyst, David Nicholl, looks at the failings and corruption of the Northern Ireland Peace Process in a two part series. He concludes that the current political spectrum is one based on greed and sectarianism, that benefits the political and business elite, at the expense of the working class. Far from making Northern Ireland a fair society, the Good Friday Agreement made it a parody of nepotism and corruption. 

Sold a Lie?

The Good Friday Agreement of 1998 was marketed to the Ulster people as the Panacea between war and peace. Designed in the hangover of a long, vicious and bitter conflict between Republicanism and the British, its advocates claimed it was the only alternative to a horrible war which had touched almost every family in the six counties and many beyond that.

The real and bitter suffering endured by so many as a result of that conflict – from actual loss of life and liberty, to the long list of other negative legacies which arise from a long terrorist war – made selling the GFA to the people much easier and in particular to the Unionist and nationalist community, in which there was little or no debate as to the long term political merits of the Agreement itself.

State directed Republican death squads, such as the PIRA and INLA, still hovered menacingly over the Unionist community in the years, during, which the GFA was designed. This spectre of random sectarian murder reminded the Protestant community that a heavy price could be extracted from them, should republicans continue to pursue a genociadal and murderous campaign in the name of Irish Nationalism.

In practice, the threat from these Irish Government sponsored killer gangs along with the continued presence of the British army and RUC provided a deadly coercive influence which made acceptance of the GFA vitally important to the average Unionist and Nationalist voter in 1998.

When packaged as a ‘vote for peace’ there was little doubt that the nationalist  and Unionist population would tick the box marked ‘Yes’, and following strong lobbying from both Sinn Fein and the SDLP, Ulster Unionists, British Government and others,  this is precisely what happened.

This same dynamic existed at the time of the Anglo Irish treaty in 1922, when Britain evoked the threat of ‘immediate and terrible war’ in a bid to coerce the people into voting in a way they saw fit.

There was no option for Unionists but to work within a framework that promised Irish unity, and if there had been it would hardly have mattered as the outcome of the northern vote [pre- Determined as it was by set to achieve in the long term Irish Unification itself] This was held supreme, regardless of what the rest of the Ulster wished for.

In this way, the Good Friday Referenda were in reality a continuation of the old Unification dynamics of the early 1920s, made possible by the same gerrymandered voting arrangements and the same threat of Irish Republican violence, as had been practiced many decades earlier. Irish history had merely came full circle and found itself back at square one, bar a series of reformist and cosmetic gestures designed to smooth the transition of the IRA into a constitutional movement, entirely absorbed into  pro Sinn Fein structures.

Blackmail Gone Mad

lpa

Given that the [once revolutionary] Provisional leadership had by this stage, committed itself to constitutional politics alone, there was little to be gained by Unionists from criticising the internal workings of the Agreement itself.

Furthermore, the failure of Loyalist/Unionist negotiators to provide basic safeguards for former combatants and prisoners in the GFA raises questions as to just how far they were willing to turn their backs on activists amongst their own ranks, (not to mention future political prisoners) in the pursuit of political ambition.

billy

Good Friday even provided for the imprisonment of its own supporters, as was later seen in the case of LVF representative Billy Wright, who upon voicing disapproval at his former party’s support for the agreement found himself arrested and imprisoned for actions he undertook decades earlier in a time of war.

Many other former Loyalist prisoners have had their release licences revoked in response to voicing or acting in a fashion critical of the Good Friday Agreement, (Michael Stone) and in effect hundreds of former POWs are today being held as hostages of their own conscience as a result, fearful of being returned to Jail should they resume Loyalist politics.

If Loyalism could get things so wrong on the welfare of Loyalist prisoners, then the question must be asked, did they get it wrong on the constitutional issue also?

The virtual interment of its political opponents today along with the coercion of the wider Unionist population in 1998 shows just shows how counterproductive the GFA really was for Unionism.

However, it is its many other aspects and dynamics which also show utterly, how the Good Friday Agreement could be used as a vehicle to deliver republican aspirations, and which explain why true Unionism , and Loyalism can have no truck with it.

Inherently Sectarian and Pro Republican

images (12)Despite being marketed as the key to ‘ending Sectarian conflict in Ireland’, the GFA is in fact a sectarian settlement, with sectarian values at its heart and a guaranteed sectarian outcome if it remains the only vision for political progress in Ireland.

From its internal clauses regarding ‘Parity of esteem’ to the constitutional out workings and daily running of its Stormont executive, the entire world view of the GFA presumes and supports a view of Irish society in which Sectarian divisions are inevitable and even natural.

Unionism, as followers of Carson and Craig, reject this ‘two communities’  “Shared Future Vision”, which the GFA enshrines as the cultural and social model around which we should base our future. We reject the notion that historical discrimination practiced upon the Catholics of the Northern Ireland, can or should be crudely addressed by simply pointing to the lot of the protestant working class and demanding the same for ‘our side’, as is proposed by supporters of the GFA. Discrimination is wrong whatever community you are from.

This eschewed view of equality creates only mistrust and deliberately lowers working class aspirations; it is exploited by the rich who take comfort in working class division and postpones the day when protestant & catholic workers unite in a true common struggle.

That is in the interests of the working class struggle to secure for the people of Northern Ireland the ownership of Ulster and all its resources to be used for the “common good”. In this sense we are truly anti-sectarian, we don’t seek equality ‘between two communities’, we seek to destroy sectarian distinctions altogether in the course of struggle to achieve a New Northern Ireland. This places us apart from the pro- GFA parties, whose values accept sectarian division and see them as inevitable, regardless of what they claim to profess.

We seek to create a “united  people”, united not within a national or communal identity but in common purpose for progressive human gain.  Stormont and its politicians, as well as the Capitalist Business Elite here, recognise the benefits of maintaining sectarian divisions within our communities.  And when we consider the potent results of this real example of class unity, then we can fully understand why the ‘powers that be’ have little interest in allowing true unity happen today; why they allow sectarianism to continue, in the form of the Good Friday Agreement.

Politicians understand that it is much easier to implement Anti-Working class cuts, such as the ‘Welfare Reform Bill’ or merely to deny workers basic rights and conditions, if the working class base sees itself as divided into two hostile factions incapable of uniting in common cause.  This dividing factor was used by the Orange and Green Politicians for hundreds of years here, and its negative influence continues today via the workings of the GFA.

map

A Vehicle for Irish Unity?

The Good Friday Agreement allowed for nationalists to express aspirational preferences towards nationalist goals in a way that Britain had virtually criminalised in previous decades. However, it is in effect a series of stage managed concession and of use to revolutionary republican intentions to unify Ireland.

Stereotyped and cosmetic gestures, tolerable to Britain (once the IRA campaign was over) were given government approval. Official recognition of the Irish language and the reduced usage of unionist trappings within government bodies, Policing and the courts were presented to the nationalist people as symbols of the processed steps towards Irish Unification and British Abandonment of the Union.

Clauses celebrated by Nationalist politicians as mechanisms to be used in the pursuit of unity were outlined in the ‘Strand 3’ section of the Good Friday Agreement.  ‘Strand 3’ reveals a Republican Veto (aka, the Principle of consent), whereby the wishes of the guaranteed Unionist majority within the six counties is now obsolete.

Strand 3 mechanisms amount to an allowance for the northern population to campaign for the ‘triggering’ of a border poll, which itself could  be authorised by  the Secretary of State, if he/she believed there was a reasonable chance of a majority ‘yes’ vote within the six counties.

This mechanism could, we were told, be worked towards while also attempting to maximise the influence of cross border governmental bodies (i.e. the North/South ministerial council) and cross border trading and economic initiatives, to effectively make the border disappear.  Again, the value of such a political dynamic is alien to Unionism, not only, because it accepts that Republicans have a right to set the conditions for Irish independence, but because it presumes that eventual moves towards independence can be achieved from a ‘greening of the north’, (that is the promotion of nationalist/Irish electoral identity within the six county area) whilst immersing the Unionist community in capitalist economics, albeit on an all-Ireland level.

We believe, that not only are strategies to secure such constitutional solutions in the Northern Ireland unrealistic (all polls refute their likelihood in this generation), their widespread promotion would, if taken seriously, spark off sectarian resentment and communal withdrawal, which would place Unionist  politics in jeopardy to the point where apparent nationalist tactics would actually deliver republican goals.

 

Greedy Politicians and Corporate Exploitation of the GFA

Multi -national corporations and worldwide business investors took great interest in the Irish “peace process”. Post GFA Northern Ireland, to them, was marketed as a place where people would work for very little and where tax breaks would be available to billionaire business owners, in return for setting up shop here. Indeed both the global and Irish financial elites promoted the GFA in order to generate future profits.

The deeply pro- business action group ‘The Portland Trust’ proudly cite how

“Leading business organisations and businessmen formed the Group of Seven (Irish G7), in 1996 to argue the economic merits of peace. Without ever explicitly calling for a ‘Yes’ vote in the referendum that ratified the Agreement, the G7 ensured, through conspicuous public advocacy, that voters understood the Agreement would be good for business.”

Ten years on from the GFA, direct investment from the US increased and has come to account for 10% of the jobs in the six counties. However the investor’s motives were far from pure. Again the Portland Trust confirms:

“To take one example, in January 2005 Citigroup chose to locate one its IT centres in Belfast, promising an investment of $100 million over five years and 375 new jobs. Citigroup was drawn to Northern Ireland by a workforce that, while possessing world-class technical skills, earns wages some 30% lower that its counterparts in England or the Republic of Ireland. Invest Northern Ireland (formerly the Industrial Development Board or IDB), the governmental agency that promotes inward Investment, provided $12.6 million to support the project.”

Many multi-national firms took advantage of these incentives, and throughout the years of the ill-fated ‘Celtic tiger’, the arrival of a plethora of factories, industrial estates, jobs and the subsequent appearance of wealth was held up as evidence of the success of the Good Friday Agreement. In reality, the firms involved in setting up here post GFA, were here only to make a quick profit and please their shareholders, not to help ease the suffering of the people of Northern Ireland.

Indeed when the inevitable world-wide recession hit, these companies (many having maxed out their tax breaks), packed up and left as quickly as they had arrived, leaving the Ulster worker with nothing but a hangover from an ‘economic miracle’ which was in fact no more than a temporary illusion.  Post-recession colossal job losses in the Northern Ireland including a massive four day 2% wipe out of the manufacturing sector, have in a very brutal fashion demonstrated to the population how for more than a decade they had been duped into believing that the post Good Friday era would be one of endless financial opportunity and prosperity.


The Roots of the Political Corruption and Greed.

Of course what we were seeing was politically motivated investment; business development grants, tax relief and subsidies, these were the elements which really provided for the changing city skylines.  The apartments, office blocks, call centres, and an army of cranes had little to do with a naturally growing, healthy indigenous economy, it was the result of a political settlement which saw the population of Northern Ireland being groomed into a pool of cheap labour, and in an environment free from Political resistance.

trade

This was the ultimate goal of the Good Friday Agreement.  A plan affirmed only recently by the G7 Fermanagh get together and the recent investment conference aimed at selling the lie all over again to the electorate.

The failure of the media to expose this, and indeed, their willingness to peddle the spin can been seen in their coverage of the constant trade missions undertaken by Stormont’s political elite.  While these tireless trade hunters, cruse the globe, in first class and stay in the most expensive hotels, there will be no trade benefits.  The reason for this is quite simple, the countries that they are most fond of cannot enter into a trade deal with Northern Ireland, they are outside the EU.  The success of them can be gauged by the main focus of their last trade mission to China: the export of pig’s trotters.

443508928_tp